Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/486
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNikolić, Mladenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarinković, Vesnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKovács, Zoltánen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaničić, Predragen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-13T09:51:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-13T09:51:53Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-15-
dc.identifier.issn10122443en
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/486-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, portfolio problem solving found many applications in automated reasoning, primarily in SAT solving and in automated and interactive theorem proving. Portfolio problem solving is an approach in which for an individual instance of a specific problem, one particular, hopefully most appropriate, solving technique is automatically selected among several available ones and used. The selection usually employs machine learning methods. To our knowledge, this approach has not been used in automated theorem proving in geometry so far and it poses a number of new challenges. In this paper we propose a set of features which characterize a specific geometric theorem, so that machine learning techniques can be used in geometry. Relying on these features and using different machine learning techniques, we constructed several portfolios for theorem proving in geometry and also runtime prediction models for provers involved. The evaluation was performed on two corpora of geometric theorems: one coming from geometric construction problems and one from a benchmark set of the GeoGebra tool. The obtained results show that machine learning techniques can be useful in automated theorem proving in geometry, while there is still room for further progress.en
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligenceen
dc.subjectAlgorithmic portfoliosen
dc.subjectAutomated theorem proving in geometryen
dc.subjectRuntime predictionen
dc.titlePortfolio theorem proving and prover runtime prediction for geometryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10472-018-9598-6-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053454787-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85053454787-
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.relation.firstpage119en
dc.relation.lastpage146en
dc.relation.volume85en
dc.relation.issue2-4en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.orcid0000−0003−0526−899X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8922-4948-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Page view(s)

27
checked on Nov 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.