Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/394
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Arandelović, Ivan D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kečkić, Dragoljub | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-10T20:28:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-10T20:28:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-11-22 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 16871820 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/394 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the paper by Khojasteh et al. (2010), the authors tried to generalize Branciari's theorem, introducing the new integral type contraction mappings. In this note we give a counterexample on their main statement (Theorem 2.9). Also we give a comment explaining what the mistake in the proof is, and suggesting what conditions might be appropriate in generalizing fixed point results to cone spaces, where the cone is taken from the infinite dimensional space. Copyright © 2010 Ivan D. Arandelovi and Dragoljub J. Keki. | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Fixed Point Theory and Applications | en |
dc.title | A counterexample on a theorem by Khojasteh, Goodarzi, and Razani | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1155/2010/470141 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-78349283463 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/78349283463 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Mathematical Analysis | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 2010 | en |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-7981-4696 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research outputs |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
10
checked on Nov 14, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.