Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/394
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArandelović, Ivan D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKečkić, Dragoljuben_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T20:28:29Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-10T20:28:29Z-
dc.date.issued2010-11-22-
dc.identifier.issn16871820en
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/394-
dc.description.abstractIn the paper by Khojasteh et al. (2010), the authors tried to generalize Branciari's theorem, introducing the new integral type contraction mappings. In this note we give a counterexample on their main statement (Theorem 2.9). Also we give a comment explaining what the mistake in the proof is, and suggesting what conditions might be appropriate in generalizing fixed point results to cone spaces, where the cone is taken from the infinite dimensional space. Copyright © 2010 Ivan D. Arandelovi and Dragoljub J. Keki.en
dc.relation.ispartofFixed Point Theory and Applicationsen
dc.titleA counterexample on a theorem by Khojasteh, Goodarzi, and Razanien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2010/470141-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78349283463-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/78349283463-
dc.contributor.affiliationMathematical Analysisen_US
dc.relation.volume2010en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7981-4696-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Page view(s)

10
checked on Nov 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.