Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/330
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBanković, Milanen_US
dc.contributor.authorFilipović, Vladimiren_US
dc.contributor.authorGraovac, Jelenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHadži-Purić, Jelenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHurson, Ali R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKartelj, Aleksandaren_US
dc.contributor.authorKovačević, Jovanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKorolija, Nenaden_US
dc.contributor.authorKotlar, Milošen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrdžavac, Nenad B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarić, Filipen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalkov, Sašaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMilutinović, Veljkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMitić, Nenaden_US
dc.contributor.authorMišković, Stefanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNikolić, Mladenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPavlović-Lažetić, Gordanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimić, Danijelaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStojanović-Djurdjević. Sanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVujičić Stanković, Stašaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVujošević Janičić, Milenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorŽivković, Miodragen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-09T12:49:12Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-09T12:49:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01-
dc.identifier.isbn9780128201961-
dc.identifier.issn00652458-
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/330-
dc.description.abstractThis article deals with teaching students how to review research articles of other authors and how to respond to reviewer comments related to their own articles. By teaching these skills, one educates students how to do something which is undoubtedly much more important for their professional development: how to properly do their own research and how to properly write their own research articles. The guidelines given are primarily intended for students of computer science. Nevertheless, the notions presented here are applicable to areas other than computing. Since there are so many branches within computing, each one characterized by its own particular features, this article also includes a section on variations of presented methodology, which are of interest for each particular branch of computer science covered by the authors of this article. In general, the review process consists of two main parts: formal review and quality review. Led by the lack of results in the available literature, an analysis based on readability index evaluates average article acceptance rates, review times, and delay period for publishing accepted articles depending on the following: article types, willingness of reviewers to do reviews, journal impact factor, and the scientific field. Quality review must be taken into account for all types of articles. Appendix A describes specific experiences from various scientific fields. Appendix B gives specific guidelines for a number of fields covered by the authors of this article.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Computersen_US
dc.subjectArticle reviewen_US
dc.subjectComputer scienceen_US
dc.subjectData scienceen_US
dc.subjectResearch methodologyen_US
dc.titleTeaching graduate students how to review research articles and respond to reviewer commentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.07.001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070674470-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85070674470-
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInformatics and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.relation.firstpage1en_US
dc.relation.lastpage63en_US
dc.relation.volume116en_US
dc.relation.issue1en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.deptInformatics and Computer Science-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0517-6334-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5943-8037-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9323-4695-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9839-6039-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0242-2472-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7219-6960-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4385-6322-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0800-2073-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3840-9931-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5386-9100-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7200-3724-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5396-0644-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Dec 19, 2024

Page view(s)

67
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.